Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 03:03

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Have you ever witnessed political correctness harm someone?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Pregnant women warned against using weight-loss jabs - BBC
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
New Xbox Game Pass Day One Game Is Instantly a Huge Hit - ComicBook.com
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
A Giant Mouth Has Opened on The Sun And Even It Looks Surprised - ScienceAlert
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Why would my husband cheat on me with an ugly fat woman?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
35 Father's Day Gifts To Just Give Yourself - BuzzFeed
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.